Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes ( for example working for a charity, improvement of the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children.
There is no doubt that community service is very beneficial to the society and high school programs should encourage students to take part in those services. But making it compulsory for the programme is not a very pragmatic idea. As a reason, high school students are busy with their studies and other activities. But it can be included in the programme by various modifications.
High school programmes are pretty advanced as it is, since it is a preparation time for students to go to colleges or to do jobs. It is a crucial time for them. Therefore, making unpaid community services can make their days quite stressful, which may have a negative effect to their main purpose. But high school programmes should nevertheless encourage them to take part in those activities, so they can be responsible members of their society.
It is a good idea to introduce community works as an optional in the high school programmes, so students can take part in it whenever they feel comfortable. This will also increase the output of their works towards the society. Another approach could be introducing those community works in the weekends and vacations, so students can both enjoy their leisure and grow up to be responsible to their society.
Making community works compulsory may also have negative effects to the job market. Many people depend on those works as a mean of their livelihood. If those works are performed by high school students, those people will be short on job, which will create an economic imbalance in the society.
Therefore, various factors have to be kept in mind before making unpaid community works compulsory for high school programmes, including the students themselves and the socio-economic balance of the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-23 | Shahrear59 | 61 | view |
- Today more people are overweight than ever before.What in your opinion are the primary causes of this?What measures can be taken to overcome this epidemic? 61
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 67
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- The study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. After studying the discipline, we see the same world as before, but with different eyes. 50
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing.What factors contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06574394464 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82226971696 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477508650519 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5444132964 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3017608836 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116668853224 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493969163999 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196298655424 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462679932222 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.