It is vital to consider social life as well as academic education. Unpaid activities like working for a charity are said to be useful for giving high school students the chance to improve their life-skills. It is also believed that such services should be a part of the compulsory part of programs at the high schools.
Community services such as improving the neighborhood are not demanded, but because of being unpaid, they lack human resources. It would be beneficial financially if these activities were assigned to students. Apart from this, teenagers need to be aware of their social responsibilities in the future. By doing these activities, instead of wasting their time playing video games, they can be well-prepared. Also, this is the right time for them because they are about to enter society.
Although it is accepted that involving teenagers in voluntary services is a good idea, it would not live up to our expectations if students were forced to do unpaid community services. In my opinion, teenagers are less likely to have a high performance if we force them to do so. Same as academic education, they can easily escape from homework unless they really want to learn. As well as this, not all kinds of community services are easy to do. For instance, teaching sports to youngsters needs a professional coach. Because it would be beyond remedy if anything went wrong.
In conclusion, voluntary community services can be a great opportunity for high school students. However, the same as academic education, they should not be compulsory and should not be risky.
- the map below show the village of stokeford in1930 and 2010 summarise the information and make comparison where relevant
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what exatent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what exatent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01520912548 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87376013329 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54752851711 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8423410266 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4375 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309598887303 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100843261794 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837739355986 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214322884606 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792216861805 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.