: Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children)
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It’s undoubtedly a fact that in order for an adolescent to grow into a functional and knowledgeable adult, not only is theoretical education required but also interpersonal along with soft skills have an irreplaceable impact. Henceforth, applying community service into high schools’ curriculum is an absolutely expedient method to cultivate the youth to develop more in terms of social intelligence.
Engaging in public services is evidently fruitful to the young generation as it yields an array of merits. Initially, by lending others a helping hand, students can have the opportunity to keep their ears to the ground about the current issues that our contemporary society is dealing with. Subsequently, they are likely to have more appreciation towards their caregivers who provide their fundamental needs to have a fulfilled life. For example, when a teenager participates in a volunteer program which supplies sustenance to the homeless, he will be able to apprehend how difficult life would be without a shelter or employment and be thankful to what he has.
Additionally, community services are also a compelling means to aid the youth to enhance their social skills. While immersing themselves in the activities, students also are supposed to cooperate with other individuals who are involved. Therefore, their ability to collaborate and communicate with others can be substantially improved. Plus, adding public services into schools’ programs are a brilliant way to make the youth balance between academic demands and volunteer work. Consequently, teenagers are able to learn how to manage their time reasonably. As a result, adolescents will be fully equipped with prerequisite skills that are needed in their future careers as they will have the enough experience to handle with the competitiveness of the work industry today.
As aforementioned, community services are extremely effective to boost the students’ overall development. Because of that, the educational systems, as well as teachers, should create more opportunities for the young generation to take part in those activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion to take part in those activities.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57453416149 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22831576589 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611801242236 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8431216134 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.214285714 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140612123902 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460586659472 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395118285534 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892677391403 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167620915203 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.