Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children)
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people assert that free services to the communities should be made compulsory in higher school programs. I completely agree with the above claim and this will elaborate on relevant reasons.
Schools play a key role in a student life. They mold a student into a decent professional. School is considered as a second home and where teachers are termed as second parents. Management should implant the unpaid services in their curriculum to develop social responsibilities in every individual. For instance, two kids from different social statuses might not be well-known for their responsibilities in society. In this case, professors should take charge and guide them about the roles, and ethical and moral values. Therefore, children will be able to establish good and equilibrium relationships among themselves without considering their status.
Social activities can help young people to become more responsible adults. It aids them to develop the vision and the purpose of their lives. To illustrate this, young people should help the older people in many ways, like teaching them how to use modern technologies, donating their belongings for basic amenities, and spending some quality time with them. All these things should learn collaboratively and shortly in practical rather than on a theoretical basis. As a result of this, they will be able to develop their personality.
To recapitulate it, as it stands now, inculcating such paid free services to the charities voluntarily and maintaining status free relationships will make children successful person in their lives as well as benefits them to grow their personalities.
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting the and reporting the main features and make comparisons were relevant 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Italy Sweden Portugal between 1967 and 2007 68
- The charts below shows the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in the year 2000 and 2010 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... reasons. Schools play a key role in a students life. They mold a student into a decent...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a practical way" with adverb for "practical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hould learn collaboratively and shortly in a practical way rather than on a theoretical basis. As ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38759689922 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05616161069 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631782945736 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.3315662368 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191247734878 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590879263514 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631735936198 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121258782487 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547045730073 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.