Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Most museums make charge fees mandatory for the entrance fee, whereas charging the people for admission to museums is required. In my viewpoint, I believe that charging the pupil does not outweigh the advantages over the disadvantages for the following compelling reasons.
On one hand, museums are considered a great source of knowledge. They have abundant information about the history of our culture and traditions. Marking up the entrance fees to visit museums may not be helpful for all stages the people. People from different statuses may not afford even the minimum amount of prices for admission. To illustrate this, a daily wage worker will only have adequate money to fulfill their hunger but not for entertainment purposes. As a result, such individuals will not benefit from all these things. Moreover, not all the countries afford free services to all the people. A poor country may not have abundant resources to provide such public amenities to its people. Providing such facilities to their individuals irrespective of the social status of its people will definitely help their commodities to gain knowledge about the history of the past, the importance of culture, monuments, and sculptures of that region. As a result, this develops the cultural level of the society.
On the other hand, a lot of workers and staff who work in museums will be beneficial when they charge the people to access such artifacts. Museums should be funded by the government or any other organization to preserve precious items such as diamonds, coins made up of gold, bronze, silver to prevent corrosion, and also for labor charges for maintenance. It is not possible to offer charge-free services to the public at all times. As a consequence, a minimal amount of money should be charged to run such huge buildings.
To recapitulate, as it stands now, although minimum costs should be acquired by the museums to maintain them, providing free access for all kinds of people will be helpful to increase the heritage of culture, traditions, and the customs of that region.
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting the and reporting the main features and make comparisons were relevant 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subject that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both the views and gi 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephonic calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Italy Sweden Portugal between 1967 and 2007 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to even'
Suggestion: to even
... from different statuses may not afford even the minimum amount of prices for admiss...
^^^^
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to free'
Suggestion: to free
... Moreover, not all the countries afford free services to all the people. A poor coun...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10294117647 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80096838173 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0746324315 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.058823529 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33553928717 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999760420767 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106204554364 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236475209593 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147252642408 0.056905535591 259% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.