Some people believe that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted, whereas others feel it is a medical necessity. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people believe that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted, whereas others feel it is a medical necessity. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.

Using animals for different medicine test has been one of the crucial problems for a long time. While many people believe that animal experiments are necessary for testing the safety of human medicines, others believe that animals are used for the health field by the humankind is not ethical.

On the one hand, there are serious reasons why a large number of animal experiments are conducted by scientists. Firstly, most of the animal’s organisms resemble to human ones. New medicines must be tested because researchers must know, whether their invention works or not, and also to find out its negative impact on our organisms. As a result, animals are suitable for testing the feature of new medicine before people can try them. Secondly, in case there are some defects, scientists will develop their product via conducting various experiments on animals, and by doing these defects will be overcome.

On the other hand, I do agree with those who argue that people do not have any right to exploit our nature. The first reason is that many animals are used for experiments and then killed. This could lead to the imbalance in the environment and cause serious global issues. Animals population has been decreasing annually, so it is already time to think about it. Another reason is that it is expensive to use model organisms as the animals because they must be purchased, fed, housed and cared.

In conclusion, I want to say that the use of animals for medical testing should be avoided at all. Animals deserve human's respect, therefore new alternatives should be created.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-02-08 Valeria Surkina 71 view
2019-02-07 Valeria Surkina 61 view
2019-02-07 Valeria Surkina 34 view
2018-11-15 Fer 73 view
2018-07-14 q0905780554 84 view
Essays by user Fer :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...one hand, there are serious reasons why a large number of animal experiments are conducted by sci...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01132075472 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59210950461 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607547169811 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0292906676 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8571428571 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22751396314 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800422124922 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632651534393 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148848654793 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570416946738 0.056905535591 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.