Some people believe that using taxpayer funds to look for life on their planets is important. Others, however, think that it’s a waste of public money because there are much more important issues requiring funding on our own planet.
Using taxpayer funds to find another planet is not that important according to some people, as they believe it is a waste of money. On the contrary there are also some people who believes that spending money looking for a better planet to live is vital nowadays according to the high level of the consumption of resources on Earth; that’s why we have to search for alternative planet to live on.
Finding a typical plant to Earth that has all the resources required to human being is not that difficult, but definitely will consume too much money to find the ideal planet. And here is the conflict the amount of money that the government spent on researches and experiments, some people think the government is not with our side and they are our foe, so they don’t believe on their decision, that is the reason why they are against the idea of spending money to find another Earth. In addition some people want to use this money to invest in other fields on Earth to make it a better place to live on.
Some others believe in the government vision. They know Earth’s resources will end up soon, and there isn’t another solution except finding alternative plant to establish our live on it again, and spending money on these researches is worthy for our future and to keep the human being in safe.
To sum up, there are many conflicts and discussions about spending money to find alternative planet instead of Earth. Some people are against the idea and some people with it. However, the most important thing that we should know is that the government don’t use our money haphazard, they know what they are doing, and this is my opinion.
- Nowadays most green energy is becoming ever more prevalent in both developed and developing countries Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment others believe they are a serious threat to energy security Discuss both views an 73
- The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 67
- Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high tech media such as software videos or Dvds Do you agree or disagree 67
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 73
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...pending money to find another Earth. In addition some people want to use this money to i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, in addition, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68493150685 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38721967767 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458904109589 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.747477574 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.8 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315646198923 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14451339695 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089001514928 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208461583298 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890847644204 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.3001002004 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.