Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

There is a common belief that it is essential for foreigners visiting a country to adhere the customs, whilst some people oppose of this and suggest that cultural dissimilarities should be given a warm welcome by the locals. Before giving a conclusion, I will investigate both angles thoroughly.
On the one hand, following country’s traditions is believed to be paramount. Being a tourist coming to a certain country, researching and obeying local customs can help visitors avoid inadvertent impoliteness to that country and its dwellers. Take Indians as a typical example, they are well-known for using their bare hands when having meals, whereas Chinese is normally more likely to eat with chopsicks as a habit. Thus, if they use chopstick while in India, they may be considered disrespectful. Accordingly, abiding by internal principles is crucial.
On the other hand, citizens ought to accept cultural divergence. They must know that some aliens have their own beliefs and practices which are compulsory not to overstep; therefore, these need to be acknowleged and respected honestly by the locals. Additionally, it provides inhabitants with opportunities to learn about cultural diversity and enrich self knowledge, especially in this era of globalization. Personal cultural norms, consequently, should be widely welcome.
To conclude, following domestic lifestyle and behavior is vitally important since it limits cultural misunderstandings, while individuals should preserve their national indentities as long as not misbehaving. From my perspective, I believe we should strike a balance between the two as both of them are precious and valuable.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, honestly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59523809524 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23423166643 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686507936508 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7264242008 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.461538462 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248683574841 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750919155014 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541014174442 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135653396524 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332570017377 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, honestly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59523809524 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23423166643 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686507936508 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7264242008 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.461538462 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248683574841 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750919155014 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541014174442 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135653396524 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332570017377 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.