Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today, while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human's life.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Human beings are always remained curious to know about history because it is the only way to search how human life has progressed from past to present. But some thinkers have opposite views. Here, In this essay, I will discuss both these views with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who believe that learning from the past is useless in the present life give some supportive views in favour. First is that life scenario has changed to a great extent. So, past knowledge is meaningless in today’s life. For example, To a study of the 13th century has no use because now we are living in the 21st century and have different needs and demands that can’t be fulfilled by the reading of the13th century. Secondly, It is a wise saying that we should forget to past to move forward so in this stiff competitive world, to reach to the heights and to grow in future the learn of the present is in demand. In addition to it, there are many subjects like science and mathematics that are far more useful than history. Therefore, wasting time on history, it is far better to study these subjects for future inventions and developments.
On the other hand, I acceded to them, but everything has its own importance and the same thing applies to history. History gives us clues about how life develops from different stages and reaches the present. Moreover, from the past it can be learned which mistakes our ancestors had done and what results they had faced. For Instance, world war first and world war second. The knowledge of the reasons of these wars can be useful to avoid to the third world war. Nobody can forget the destruction caused by atom bombs. It is massage for this generation how dangerous can be the use of atomic bombs.
In the conclusion, Though people believe that learning past has no use in the today’s life, but we can not neglect the benefits of past history because it only way to know how we reach at present.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | Sahejpreet | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | Ibknaanii | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | ngan phan | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | trungtrung | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | kubra | 73 | view |
- the pie chart below shows the results of a survey in which undergraduate and postgraduate 78
- Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas. Does advantage outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Many jobs in the home nowadays can be done by machine. Has it brought more advantage than disadvantage. 56
- line 11
- Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ch to the heights and to grow in future the learn of the present is in demand. In additio...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, for example, for instance, in addition, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6387283237 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43360324181 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526011560694 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9467465856 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284985434364 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830236624311 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808622728864 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188993207887 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516307271214 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.