Some people believe that what children watch on television influences their behaviour. Others say that amount of time spent watching television influences their behaviour. Discuss both views and give own opinion
The influence of television on children is a topic of considerable debate. Some argue that the content of television programs plays the most significant role in shaping children's behavior, while others believe the amount of time spent watching television is the key factor. This essay will delve into both perspectives before presenting a balanced conclusion.
One compelling argument is that the content of television programs can have a profound impact on children's behavior. Children are highly impressionable, and they often mimic the actions and behaviors they witness on television. For instance, exposure to violent content in movies or video games can lead to increased aggression and desensitization to violence. Conversely, programs that promote positive social values, such as empathy and cooperation, can foster desirable traits. It is therefore crucial to curate children's television viewing experience to ensure they are exposed to content that aligns with positive social and moral development.
However, it is equally important to consider the impact of excessive television viewing on children's well-being. Spending extended periods of time in front of the screen can lead to a sedentary lifestyle, contributing to obesity and physical health issues. Moreover, excessive screen time can hinder cognitive development by reducing opportunities for engagement in other activities that stimulate brain growth, such as reading, playing, and social interactions. Furthermore, consistent exposure to bright screens can disrupt sleep patterns and negatively affect mental health.
Ultimately, it is not solely about the content or the duration, but rather the balance between the two. While curating children's exposure to appropriate content is paramount, the moderation of screen time is equally important. Children need ample opportunity for physical activity, social interaction, and creative pursuits that encourage cognitive development and emotional well-being. Parents play a critical role in setting boundaries and fostering healthy habits regarding television consumption.
In conclusion, while the content of television programs can influence children's behavior, the amount of time spent watching television is equally significant. Striking a balance between these factors is essential for fostering healthy development. Children need a diverse range of experiences, including physical activity, social interaction, and creative pursuits, to thrive. Parents and educators must work together to ensure that children enjoy the benefits of television while minimizing its potential negative impacts.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-29 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
2024-04-25 | Sang Sang Sang | 84 | view |
2021-05-09 | tanthao123456 | 89 | view |
2021-03-06 | nexito | 78 | view |
2021-03-05 | nexito | 78 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2248.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04301075269 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09258041897 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545698924731 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8945423335 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.4 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220658874898 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713215055324 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918846944049 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14416841392 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988705846105 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.75 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.