Some people believe that when designing a building, the most important thing to be considered is the function rather than the outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree
There are tons of builds that not only have beautiful appearance but also are equipped with advanced technologies in this modern world. It is true that building with advanced functions could improve our living standards, but I would argue that the appearance of architectures also plays a crucial role in people’s daily life.
Houses equipped with multiple functions can make people’s life more comfortable and convenient because people can sue these advanced technologies to help them deal with some problems about their work or daily exercise. For Instance, there are a number of buildings with several functions in university, including playing basketball, playing football, watching TV and so on. These architectures are not only just functioned as a place for students studying; they can also use it to do some leisure activities too. As a result, these students do not need to go to the gym which is far from their university, instead doing sports in these buildings after class. It makes them university life more convenient and they also gain a better experience in their university.
On the other hand, buildings with good appearance can make people’s daily life more colorful, which has a positive influence on people mood. Good-looking buildings with some interesting themes could put people in a better mood. For example, if some theme museums can be built based on their themes, it is more likely to attract most of the visitors’ attention and these visitors can have a good time in these places, and also their life would be more colorful due to the gorgeous and awesome architecture styles.
In conclusion, the multiple functions of houses indeed bring people tons of benefits, but I would reckon that both building’s appearance can make a huge difference to people’s every day’s life, it makes our life full of color.
- Some people claim that many things that children are taught at school are a waste of time. Other people argue that everything children study at school is useful at some time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people claim that many things that children are taught at school are a waste of time. Other people argue that everything children study at school is useful at some time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people believe that when designing a building, the most important thing to be considered is the function rather than the outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Workers work at home due to modern technology. Many people say that only these employees and not employer can benefit from it. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Workers work at home due to modern technology. Many people say that only these employees and not employer can benefit from it. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rgeous and awesome architecture styles. In conclusion, the multiple functions of...
^^^
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... life, it makes our life full of color.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20529801325 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96242717007 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529801324503 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.467197839 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.909090909 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4545454545 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101721379706 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467984769143 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265932105758 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657866176077 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240265171612 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.