Gender equality is being seen in all domains in the 21st century as women are being empowered. While some believe that women should participate in the armed and law enforcement roles equally because they have the ability to perform the same as men, nevertheless, others opine that the road to combat equality is a difficult one for women. I totally agree with the former view.
Women have proved that they are physically, mentally, and morally capable of leading and executing warfare or riot control operations. Furthermore, they are equally capable of men, ranging from front-line infantry positions to high-level special operations roles. For instance, in the modern world of combat (Afghanistan, Iraq), all women serving in the defense are exposed to “front-line risks” and their necessity has been recognized.
Conversely, many believe that due to biological factors, women are not physically as strong as men. They can’t endure the physical and physiological rigors of sustained combat operations and attempting to reach them will over-stretch themselves. They are more vulnerable to abuse by mobs, criminals, or enemies. Pregnancy and long maternity leave can affect military readiness and the society is also not ready for women coming back in body bags.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that both sides of the argument have their merits. In modern high technology battlefields or criminal investigations, technical expertise and decision-making skills are more valuable than simple physical strength. If women are restricted to perform these duties, nations will make the mistake of excluding 50 percent of their population from productive, patriotic duties.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55642023346 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95771037961 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642023346304 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1041401072 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.846153846 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193573053492 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600322576675 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604721865907 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113172168781 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709153383387 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.