Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very less about famous people from the history in their own country. Why is this? How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about their own famous people from history?
The young theseday prefer to follow international super stars than to know about well-known historical people in the own country. There are several reasons for this phenomenon but also some straightforward measures we can take to address this issue.
There are couple of reasons why younger generation prioritize less their attention on famous people in history than music and movie stars, ranging from education to public commumication. Fisrtly, in term of education, historical subjects seem to be less appearling to student at school. Undeniably, these subjects required student to remember a bundan of events and associated people, making the subject becomes stressfull or overburdended of theory. Secondly, the images of famous historical people seem to apprear less in almost means of public communication. On the ground of maximizing the number of audiences, both newspapers and tv show producers are motivated to making movies or news on burning issues or privated stories of supers stars rather than reputable people from history.
Since this issue is serious, the government and related divisions should take steps immediately. One necessary action is that school should enhance the teaching method on historical subjects so that it appears to be attrative to learners. For example, history teachers could apply high-tech devices in presentation the stories of historical famous people in vivid vay rather than wholy base on paper books. Another valuable action is that the government should spend more budget on broadening the images of historical people in public communication. Only by being allocated more spending, could producers on historical movies or shows give birth of attractive chanels to compete with entertainment ones.
In conclusion, there are two main causes to the fact that historical famous people are known less by the young than music and film stars, and appropriate actions need to be taken to address this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-11 | baokhanh | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | phg_phg | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | rakholiyadivyesh50@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-13 | hoangquyen1904 | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-13 | hoangquyen1904 | 89 | view |
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 61
- Fossil fuels (Coal, oil and natural gas) are the main source in many countries. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind or solar energy) are encouraged. Do you think that it is positive or negative development? 78
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that it is more benefit to take part in sports which are played by a team, like football, while other think that taking part in individual sport, like tennis or swimming is better. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 605, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...allocated more spending, could producers on historical movies or shows give birth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47854785479 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87688464668 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577557755776 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0169691168 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.692307692 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314823814174 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104332676614 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875400581048 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194193687809 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624723781982 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.