Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very little about famous people from the history in their own country (national historic/heroic figures).
Why is this?
How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about their own famous people from history?
These days, people are more interested in worldwide celebrities and movie stars than national historic figures. In this essay, I will outline the main reason for this issue as well as the solution to mitigate the situation.
There are some rationales to explain why teenagers have a huge interest in international celebrities. First of all, famous people’s lives are grabbing the headlines of the majority of all online Internet platforms. Meanwhile, the youngsters tend to spend most of their spare time on networking sites, since such information about these popular people will appear more frequently; therefore this will naturally grow their interest in this topic. Furthermore, the approach of history teaching methods at conventional schools seems to be unattractive. It is because teachers are using too many theories instead of practical stimulation, which makes the students easily lose interest in the class.
However, there are several solutions to tackle the situation described above. Firstly, films and TV show directors should be encouraged to produce documentary programs or films that are relevant to certain historical events with the collaboration with international celebrities. This will provide a tremendous amount of attention from all ages, including the young, as they follow the popular star, they will also obtain more knowledge about the national history through the documentary film. Besides, history teaching methods at school also need to change drastically to appeal to more students. In fact, a history class could be fun and creative, for instance, teachers can make it more intriguing by creating an animation video about the lesson and dubbing their voice or making jokes to make the students laugh.
In conclusion, two main reasons why young people are more interested in international pop and movie stars are the popularity of celebrities on the Internet and the boring history teaching methods. Nevertheless, encouraging films and programs based on historical events and changing the history teaching approach can be viable solutions to this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | Hoàng Anh Minh | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | Hoàng Anh Minh | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-27 | sangeeth28 | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-29 | haphuongpham49 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very little about famous people from the history in their own country national historic heroic figures Why is this How can more interest be created in young people 84
- Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very little about famous people from the history in their own country national historic heroic figures Why is this How can more interest be created in young people 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 817, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aking jokes to make the students laugh. In conclusion, two main reasons why youn...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51242236025 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89487140778 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6756895385 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.785714286 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336508190971 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10238777007 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823913138446 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21175839555 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399521491108 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.