Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for goverment to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste ?
Recyling waste from families or individuals a meaningful activity that governments should incentive people. However, there is a notion that waste is not recycled enough so that governments should make it required. In this essay, I will express my view about it.
First of all, it is no doubt that if governments launch a law to force people to divide the garbages then recycle it, the result will be more effective than let them do it spontaneously. Understandably, every individuals need to behave under legals Unless , they can be punished. That is to say, to avoid punishments, they will recycle as compulsory as they must be.
However, it it pretty hard to control how people recycle waste from their own home. Hence, instead of imposing a law, governments can take into account to educate people how importance of recycling is. It means that when people are enhanced their cognition about recycling, they will voluntarily do without any enforcement.
Furthermore, a legal requirement needed to convince everybody to embrace in order to avoid controversy and backlash. Imagine, if governments give the families and individuals a small give when they recycle well, it will be better and they will have more inspiration to recycle. In contrast, being punished by garbages may sound uncomfortable with some people. In result, they will not regular and try to against.
In conclusion, from my personal perspective, I do believe making recyling as a legal requirement is not the best idea, instead, governments can impose the other manners which are aforementioned to make it effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-06 | do thu trang | 56 | view |
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not only reasons why some people should learn a foreign a language Discuss both these views and give your 73
- Computers are becoming an essential parts of school lessons Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion 60
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of the young aldults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 77
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...duals need to behave under legals Unless , they can be punished. That is to say, t...
^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...s compulsory as they must be. However, it it pretty hard to control how people recyc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pretties'?
Suggestion: pretties
...ulsory as they must be. However, it it pretty hard to control how people recycle wast...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o without any enforcement. Furthermore, a legal requirement needed to convince e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, then, well, in conclusion, no doubt, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16949152542 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06051762716 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1069716218 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357100755745 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128872194953 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743649527833 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185890330655 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557697727836 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.