It is true that waste from households and recycling is not balanced. And some individuals believe governments should increase home recycling opportunities. But I think the right solution for this issue that government should attend education about recycling.
There are several reasons why government make it requirement. Firstly, it could reduce waste in everywhere and make cities clean. We live in a time when the environment and streets are full of rubbish. It leads air pollution and some infectious disease that dangerous for our life. Secondly, recycled rubbish is a new resource for our daily needs and industry. Resources in our planet are limited and remained in small quantities, so humanity need new sources or have to recycle them. Furthermore, another advantage of recycled product is that it lowers the cost of some raw materials.
On the other hand, there are some drawbacks in this problem. First, they require a lot of money from recycler because the equipments are more expensive and they have to hire workers who collect the rubbish. In addition, if governments want to reduce the waste from households, they should focus on upbringing the young generation in a smart way. In the words, young generation can create new effective way of reproducing. Finally, we can say that it is impossible in cities because of shortage of some extra space for collect and save the waste. In fact cities suffer from overpopulation and some type of waste travels of town.
In conclusion, households and education are necessary to encourage households to recycling. Personally, I believe that there would be more efficiency in recycling if government can balance both law and education.
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows a process for turning dirty water into clean water Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is true that waste from households an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a smart way" with adverb for "smart"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ocus on upbringing the young generation in a smart way. In the words, young generation can cre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent can balance both law and education.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17518248175 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90202675452 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569343065693 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0618921459 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.7777777778 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2222222222 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364560059514 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101316269248 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660921687952 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204101658161 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592545598186 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.