Nowadays, we live in a society that is highly consumist, therefore recycling is an crucial topic of the present. To increase the participation of population on such movement, some may argue that the government should intervene. In my opinion, laws can affect all people and change is mandatory, if we want a better tomorrow by reducing pollution and it's effects on climate change.
First of all, the impact that laws have, can change whole cultures, if they are properly done. While they influence many people due penalties if non compliance, also can indirectly give rise to more infrastructures that facilitate the access to recycling. Therefore, if a family have a recycling bin outside of their home, it is much easier to persuade them to do the right action, especially if there is a fine if they do not. But not only the law itself should be a reason, also governments should get involved due to ethical reasons, regarding the urgency of the situation.
Furthermore, the climate change and it's impact is a reality that the state must act upon by reducing waste and give the example to other countries around world. Although reduce in domestic garbage is the first step for a bigger change, the promotion of these behaviours must come from the top. Moreover, when a whole country changes, a ball of snow effect begins, giving rise to continents modifications and later the whole world. For all these reasons the laws are one of the best ways to promote behaviour changes.
In conclusion, in a topic of such importance as recycling, the governments should have an active role, contributing with laws that promote individual human behaviour modifications. I also would recommend partnerships between several countries to facilitate and make quicker changes.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 89
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ighly consumist, therefore recycling is an crucial topic of the present. To increa...
^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...the top. Moreover, when a whole country changes, a ball of snow effect begins, giving r...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06164383562 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88944507656 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602739726027 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5326516722 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.692307692 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189773382398 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058578116976 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333449244747 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100546943482 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448176082516 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.