some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent, do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Nowadays, environmental issues are always the hottest affair that need considering on global scale. It is believed that the situation of too little household waste recycled, legal obligations should be made to make families recycle more waste from home. In my opinions, I totally agree with this statement.
The first factor to be mentioned is that governmental laws could have a large impact on the majority of people. To be specific, under law systems, most people will obey on the legal requirement as citizen’s responsibility, especially about environment. The obligations will take effects to the large number of people which require all household recycle their waste. It is the factor to boost the proportion of people recycling their garbage leading the potential solutions to green issues. For example, when national obligation about recycling are implemented, this action not only affects to individuals of an area but also the whole country. As for the large scale of citizen’s awareness, the chance of increasing the amount of waste recycled is more possible.
Another point, laws have ability to enhance the education of citizen about recycling as well as environmental affairs. In other word, knowledge about environmental issues of citizen will be enriched by the legal requirement. People will research more about the reasons why the requirement is put forward and the advantages of it as well as they may also be aware of the right procedure of recycling which brings effectiveness the most. For instance, adding to the statute, many campaigns and lessons will be established to support citizen get access to related information. As a result, when people acknowledge the benefit of recycling their household garbage, they will take action even without the disciplines.
In conclusion, putting forward laws about recycling which have significant impact on the majority citizen may bring about many plus points and this legal requirement should be made as soon as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-14 | minhtrieutr | 73 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The diagram below shows how geotherml energy is used to produce electricity 11
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- in number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between locations. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transports. Discuss both 56
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e action even without the disciplines. In conclusion, putting forward laws abou...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37777777778 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97929362034 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7482891445 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.933333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264653777653 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921068312027 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723795938313 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163497189474 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650091658847 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.