Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled.
They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
A controversy has arisen over the issue of whether legislation is the only solution to enhance recycling or not. In spite of arguments underestimating the pivot role of other methods, I would contend that both laws and other motivations are warranted to accelerate the prevalent of recycling.
First of all, it is an irrefutable fact that force would lead to more compliance. Through this, not only does the government observe people’s activities legally, but it also is entitled to punish them due to disobedience. In this situation people would be more determined to separate the litter. Fear, nonetheless is chief among all reasons impelling them to take an environmental-friendly approach. Thus, extreme laws would eventually lead to alienation from government and following a rule with no knowledge which is a detrimental result. To mediate the strictness of this matter other methods are required.
Alternatives such as advertising and financial supports can be effective as well as resulting a paradigm shift in society’s understanding. If people was informed about the importance of recycling through different shapes of media such as TV, newspapers, and radio, they would be more inclined to contribute to it deliberately. Further, government can accelerate this process by offering monetary incentives to families doing activities on behalf of recycling, taking their bottles to be recycled, for instance.
By way of conclusion, enacting new legislation can be firmly considered as a method associated with revolutionizing recycling. Meanwhile, other alternatives such as financial incentives and advertisement can increase the pace as well as giving people motivations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-31 | AATIF AIYUB SALEH | 56 | view |
| 2020-12-21 | chathurika | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Noah1997 | 95 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Noah1997 | 56 | view |
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The photo is in the next post 11
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 61
- Many people believe that it is better to learn something in a group rather than individually.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Nowadays people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organization.What might this be the case?What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as well as giving people motivations.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nonetheless, so, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65625 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49315737371 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62890625 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7354859247 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.384615385 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154033591194 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504385553125 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392820931685 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085301467021 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253708461519 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.