Some people claim that not enough waste from homes is recycled and that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that people nowadays do not recycle enough household waste. Although enacting a mandate for recycling can have beneficial influences, I advocate that it is not the only measure as it fails to address the underlying cause of environmental issues and other solutions are needed.
The argument in favor of making recycling compulsory is that in doing so, people can be motivated to recycle more. It may not only reduce the amount of waste released but also mitigate air and soil contamination as well as overload landfills. Another advantage is that this method can help humans save the world's resources while being a precursor to preventing energy crises in the near future. However, such reasoning is flawed with pitfalls. If people are legally enforced to recycle household waste, this may confront public backlash and resistance, which can cause them to harbor resentment towards the authorities. As a result, this issue is problematic to pass, especially in places where people are highly protective of their civil rights, such as America. Therefore, to avoid causing tensions among the public, other solutions should be considered.
Instead of forcing people to recycle their household waste, other more feasible measures should be adopted by governments. First, there should be more public education for residents to warn them about the adverse consequences of damaging the environment. Higher public consciousness can be a precursor to other actions to protect the environment, including planting trees and using environmentally friendly products. Moreover, the government had better offer financial incentives to enhance householders’ recycling behavior as well as mitigate the number of waste.
In conclusion, I am strongly convinced that compulsory requirements may not bring desirable benefits; therefore, other steps including more public education and financial incentives should be considered
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- The chart below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people claim that not enough waste from homes is recycled and that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- the pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61301369863 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00898409256 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595890410959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.646971239 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.071428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17481277264 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06770402094 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732105596684 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110455387642 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064602743729 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.