Some people claim that young people are more creative than older people in business or in the workplace. Do you agree or disagree with this?
The youth is considered to be more artistic in business sphere or in their work compared with old generation. I partially agree with this statement. Although youngsters with their creativity are claimed as curious and innovative employees, middle-ages who have obtained a lot of experience during work-time can bring plethora of benefits to companies, too.
On the one hand, majority of employers are likely to prefer to give workplaces to young employees because of their activeness, having computer skills and curiosity. In XXI century, it is very crucial to know how to use IT equipment in every field. For this reason, there are many opportunities for new young staff to find a job since numerous authorities need such young people to work with in their corporations. Old people can face difficulties using these technologies while doing their duties.
On the other hand, elders read books in various genres, with the help of reading they gain a lot of knowledge and become a competent worker. Therefore, they are seen as an indicator of productivity to recruiting agents. For example, even if youths are good at innovation, working in up-to-date applications, they may not understand how to solve their issues or how to work in old traditional working systems which can be still encountered in some cases. Then they tend to require help from older employees.
By way of conclusion, I believe that most organisations have the necessity of providing both young and old people with job. Otherwise, businessmen can not achieve the higher places in ranking effectiveness of work in annual rewards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'genre'?
Suggestion: genre
...er hand, elders read books in a various genres, with the help of reading they gain man...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...res, with the help of reading they gain many knowledge and become a competent worker...
^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much knowledge', 'a good deal of knowledge'.
Suggestion: much knowledge; a good deal of knowledge
...res, with the help of reading they gain many knowledge and become a competent workers, therefo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'worker'?
Suggestion: worker
...n many knowledge and become a competent workers, therefore, they are seen as a indicato...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nt workers, therefore, they are seen as a indicator of productivity to recruiting...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26877470356 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99644370443 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664031620553 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8059914747 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.181818182 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221317175238 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837440643877 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662450358012 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1243630252 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571906793125 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.