Some people get into debt by buying things they don t need and can t afford What are reasons for these behaviors What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem

Nowadays, living in modern and materialistic world is challenge. Many are in opinion that people these days spend too much money on unnecessary belongings which lead them to getting into debt. From my point of view, the exist of credit cards and residing in wealthy society are the main culprit of indebtedness.

To begin with, in every single year, myriad technology companies fight against each other to launch their breakthrough innovation. Even though, these technologies are unaffordable for poverty-stricken, they will use their credit cards to buy, because they obsessed with that aspects. At the end of each month, time to pay has come yet they still do not have any money. To solve this problem, I strongly suggest to restrict the access of credit card for impoverished people. Banks have to come up with some policies, for example, people who receive the salary above 30,000 baht per months are allowed to register for the credit card.

In addition, social prestige are imperative for whom living in affluent society. Having the brandnames, in particular, Channels and Louis Vuitton will help them get along with their friends. Some of them were risen in middle-classed families, hence their parents cannot afforded those priceless bags. By doing this, the families can get into problems. The obvious solution is that the offsprings should concerned about their families troubles and cut off the inessential things. Moreover, they should work either part-time or full-time to pay their own lives expenses.

To conclude, the chances of becoming a fatality of the consumer’s society are high due to the surrounding temptations but this problem could be easily avoid by being aware of these dangers and having a rational attitude when dealing with money.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etting into debt. From my point of view, the exist of credit cards and residing i...
^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ting into debt. From my point of view, the exist of credit cards and residing in wealthy...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y are the main culprit of indebtedness. To begin with, in every single year, myr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest restricting'.
Suggestion: suggest restricting
...oney. To solve this problem, I strongly suggest to restrict the access of credit card for impoveris...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, moreover, so, still, for example, in addition, in particular, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21830985915 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72737123589 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676056338028 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1286555922 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223063112405 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654130521708 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579055018678 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118581821718 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137128714032 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.