Some people prefer to provide help and support directly to those in the local community who need it. Others, however, prefer to give money to national and international charitable organisations. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Helping others is virtuous things. There have been divided opinion on the topic that how to do charity. Some group of individuals feel that it is very beneficial to give essential support and help directly to needy people. Other people like to donate money to national and global charitable units. Ahead of my inclination, both views should be analysed in ensuing paragraph.
Explaining the former opinion, the primary argument the supporters would like to put forward is that person remains directly in contact of poor people. They can watch that needy people are using all things given by them. Additionally, it reduces chance of high corruption. What I mean, if you donate something to any needy citizen by your hand, there is no chance of corruption by top level authorities of the nation and international charity institute. Moreover, we can get more happiness in hand to hand donation than to any organisation because expression and smile of needy people is priceless.
On the flip side, other persons admit that charity organisations manage global issues more precisely than individual donation. Appropriate donation is given by institutes at proper place because they have useful information of poverty rate of every country. With help of latest data, they can distribute money or food or cloths in proper proportion. For example, Africa have more needy people than USA; so organisation provides more support to Africa than USA. Moreover, charity institute have larger network which is very helpful to spread help very quickly. Furthermore, along with money organisations can offer services like team of doctors, volunteer and so on. Because money is not everything what people wants. For example, they give help in form of medicines via doctors. As well as, they give chance to teacher to teach in under-developed nations.
To sum up with my opinion, I tend to perceive that both type of charity has their own advantages. One to one charity gives you satisfaction of giving and corruption free charity organisations are essential to remove world-wide need and poverty. Thus, there are different ways to achieving same goal.
- As more and more people move to cities and as cities expand in size, City life loses its appeal To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 84
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming wider, the rich more richer, the poor even more poorer. What problems can the situation cause and give the solutions? 61
- Some people believe that improve public health should increase the number of sports facilities; others believe that it has little effects and need other measures to improve it. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilisers and better machinery. However, some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities. To what extent do you agre 84
- In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as valuable work experience. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...overty rate of every country. With help of latest data, they can distribute money or food...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e team of doctors, volunteer and so on. Because money is not everything what people wan...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, i mean, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19075144509 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79738330163 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586705202312 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8737572417 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6363636364 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7272727273 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203756335853 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555085013809 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440837492724 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128980141311 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558973585483 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.