Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.
In this fast-paced society where technology and lifestyle are evolving at every step, there are those who dedicate themselves to carrying routine activities devoid of making some changes in their lives. On the other hand, others believe that change is for the better. In this essay, I will examine both perspectives and will give feedback on the argument.
Individuals who prefer to maintain their livelihood and hobbies within a repetitive pattern, tend to be highly goal-oriented with a distinct purpose to achieve in the long run. Such people believe that making a slight variation in their daily activities can cause distraction within their targeted objectives.
However, those who strive to bring about changes hold onto the notion that it would help people to live a more healthy and active life. By staying within the routine leads to monotony which in turn can trigger anger, melancholy, and lack of motivation.
Personally, I believe that we should bring in changes within our everyday affairs as it enables us to see life from a different perspective and we can try to embrace ourselves to the fullest. Furthermore, variations allow us to be more adaptable and flexible in any kind of situation as it forces us to think beyond our confined dimensions.
In conclusion, there should be a routine in life that can give us purpose and be able to keep ourselves on track but adding certain alterations, it will help us to step outside of our comfort zone and be able to tackle any kind of challenges.
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 67
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian unive
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98031496063 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7617064931 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586614173228 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.569467711 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137495858183 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595147401038 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056155936402 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729063030933 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470042039141 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.