Some people say that the benefits of the Internet far outweigh the drawbacks. To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is argued that the positive sides of the internet are more intensely outstanding than its negative consequences. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this statement.
On the one hand, the appearance of the internet causes some negative impacts on human life. First of all, people could generally get addicted to social media on account of its irresistible attraction. As a consequence, individuals will not focus on their works while being distracted by the smartphone. For example, young students constantly chat with their friends and might probably lose their self-discipline in the absence of the supervision of the parents or teachers. Thus, the progression of studying those children would be seriously affected and they may get a low mark in the class. Moreover, the growth of fabrications also becomes a remarkably alarming problem with people. The existence of numerous yellow journalisms may lead to the misunderstanding in people. For instance, the rampant appearance of the fake news about the corona pandemic in Viet Nam draws too much unnecessary concern of residents. For this reason, this situation leads to the overconsumption of anti-epidemic instruments.
On the other hand, the development of the internet plays a vitally important part by providing us countless advantages. The most common one is for the commercial purposes. A first-class website is always an ideal place for companies to put their advertisement. If widespread in an effective way, entrepreneurs may generate an enormous amount of profit. Secondly, the contribution of the internet to the education field is also dispensable. Students nowadays would be able to approach with the valuable academic material to assist for the sake of their study progression. Not only that, but students may also accurately evaluate their knowledge in their school or university websites.
Lastly, several of the disadvantages of the internet could partly be rectified when being monitored by the national authorities. By carefully censoring the contents of the internet and propagandizing effectively, Governments could remarkably limit those of two negative aspects above.
In conclusion, although I agree that there are some weaknesses of the internet, I still completely believe that it’s an inseparable part of the progress of the human revolution in the future due to all of the beneficial things it gives us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-07 | folina | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-29 | tan1010pro | 84 | view |
- It is inevitable that as technology advances, traditional cultures will be lost. It seems that we cannot have these two things together.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people say that the benefits of the Internet far outweigh the drawbacks To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In the modern world there is a movement away from written exams to more practical assessment 67
- In the modern world there is a movement away from written exams to more practical assessment 84
- In the modern world there is a movement away from written exams to more practical assessment 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... put their advertisement. If widespread in an effective way, entrepreneurs may generate an enormous...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e human revolution in the future due to all of the beneficial things it gives us.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42091152815 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22335640632 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597855227882 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4467119546 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7619047619 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0806049024914 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0233646196212 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306114162453 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0549188643754 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242453500869 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.