Some people say that charities are necessary to help the poor, but others argue that charities just make the poor dependent and decrease their motivation to succeed.
\Public opinion on how to effectively give financial support the poor still remains divided. While some people believe that giving material support like money makes them dependent and lose the urge to strive and succeed, I would say that these people are those who are in desperated need for our support, hence charitable oganizations need to adopt certain criteria and rules in order to help them constructively.
On the one hand, it is widely justifiable why some people oppose funding to the impoverished. The key rationale is that some people who do not have self-esteem would rely too much on these organizations and take advatage of these subsidies to live a sendentary life, not worrying about earning money to live independently. However, this situation seems to be something of a rarity. In orther words, it is true that finance from charities could discourage the poor to make effort and gain success in some ways, I would argue this circumstance is not common and can only be seen is a few people.
On the other hand, although charities are much needed source of material support for those who are underprivileged as these people are hopless if there is no innitial funding for them to settle down before finding a job and having the opportunity to finance themself. However, I would say that the funding given from these organizations should be restricted and regulated carefully to guarantee that the poor only have enough, but not excessive, amount. Moreover, this support can not be something of perpetuity, thus they need to manage to be employed and be independent later on.
In conclusion, I would say that some negative sides could possibly be seen from giving money to a few people living in poverty, however the majority needs this kind of funding and the charities themselfe also need to have certain measures to limit the demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-19 | PhuongTh@o. | 52 | view |
- the plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
- THE DIAGRAM BELOW SHOWS A POSSIBLE FUTURE MEANS OF HOME ENERGY PRODUCTION 11
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagre 78
- Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people while others think it has the opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- the plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...n, I would say that some negative sides could possibly be seen from giving money to a few peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sibly be seen from giving money to a few people living in poverty, however the ma...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, in conclusion, kind of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97435897436 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77737998467 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535256410256 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.6684528362 49.4020404114 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.2 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2 20.7667163134 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206269539299 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774215857874 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540499137164 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128402032036 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305941106813 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.