People hold different views in terms of the frequency of air travel. There is a school of though which believes that the current level of air travel is acceptable, whereas other people argue that this phenomenon should be decreased and this responsibility belongs to the government. This essay will shed light on both views before presenting my opinion.
On the one hand, it is understandable why many people show their agreement on the rate of travelling by air nowadays. This stems from numerous benefits brought by air tourism. Firstly, air travel is regarded as an important driving force to boost and promote both the national and global economy. Because of the flexibility, convenience and high quality, increasingly number of customers have a tendency to choose travel pattern by air rather than other means of transport, which maximizes the productivity of airline and tourism agencies. As a result, the higher the revenue they receive, the more taxes they need to contribute to the government's budget. Secondly, travelling by air help to address the problem relating to traffic congestion at rush hours. Thanks to the distribution of a large number of passengers on air, the rate of traffic jam is improved especially in dense-populated areas, and the proportion of traffic road injuries declines considerably, from 21% to 12%, according to the national statistics.
On the other hand, despite some arguments mentioned above, I contend that this situation should be strictly controlled by government's policies for several reasons. This is mainly because air travel has enormous impacts on the environment. Through operation process, airplanes directly discharged fuel and dust into the atmosphere, which can not only break the view of transports, posing a risk of air fatal accidents but also reduce the air quality on the whole, even leading to air pollution. Therefore, the immediate steps of the government have to be taken to diminish the negative effects from air travel. By adopting environmental law, government could limit the frequency of air travel of citizens and also encourage them to commuting by other eco-friendly transports.
In conclusion, while some people accept the current circumstance of air travel, I agree with this opposite view which ải travel should be reduced and the government is responsible for this pressing problem.
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city 61
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 84
- Many people believe that university students should pay tuition fees in full themselves because they gain education for their own benefit and not for the society To what extent do you agree or disagree 47
- Some people say that the current level of air travel is acceptable where as other people believe air travel should be reduced and the government should play a role in this Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
- write a report describing the info below The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 414, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to travel'
Suggestion: to travel
... of customers have a tendency to choose travel pattern by air rather than other means ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 788, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...sh hours. Thanks to the distribution of a large number of passengers on air, the rate of traffic ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... responsible for this pressing problem.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.304 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96778076459 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578666666667 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.766948987 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.3125 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455149617621 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150989009943 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976207611498 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316505853011 0.151304729494 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772322721972 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.