Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magzines to what extent do you agree or disagree

Today world has become the small village by advancement in technological field. Majority of world population are embracing modern devices rather than traditional newspaper and magazines. Some believe that technology will be replace by digital system. I partially agree with this due to the fact preference and habbit are the two aspect that balance both modern and traditional uses.

On one hand, digital system have suppress traditional uses for the reason like less time consuming, eassy to access etc. The psychological fact is human life is influenced even by single technological aspect that one can't imagine life without it. Cell phone for instance, have affect globally in such a way that every single individual have mobile almost all the time on their hand which obviously have make life easier. So advancement had lead the world than cultural paper based system.

On the other hand, most of the things can be changed but not the habit. As regarding to the people who are habitual on writing and an individual with a cup of tea and newspaper early morning make sense that though technology may change they resist making change on their routine. For example, your body must be active for creativity. Rather staying infront of computer screen every writer prefer paper and pen for writing. So there may some changes but use of traditional paper and magazines can't supplant its existence.

In conclusion, being superior creature human wouldn't prefer the changes on what they like and go according to their habit. So some changes can takes place in the field of paper and magazines but can't fully replace by E-books and modern technology.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'suppressed'.
Suggestion: suppressed
...es. On one hand, digital system have suppress traditional uses for the reason like le...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...by single technological aspect that one cant imagine life without it. Cell phone for...
^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ife without it. Cell phone for instance, have affect globally in such a way that ...
^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
...ve make life easier. So advancement had lead the world than cultural paper based sys...
^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...our body must be active for creativity. Rather staying infront of computer screen ever...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 493, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... use of traditional paper and magazines cant supplant its existence. In conclusio...
^^^^
Line 7, column 46, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...nclusion, being superior creature human wouldnt prefer the changes on what they like an...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...in the field of paper and magazines but cant fully replace by E-books and modern tec...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07720588235 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56152399338 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599264705882 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8523629128 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164649133667 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566459635094 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060145229621 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110361428986 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767045813007 0.056905535591 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.