Some people say free time activities for children should be organized (by parents). Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Hitherto, globalization has led to some disparities in the credo of kids’ management, and the question of whether parents should control the leisure time of their children or not has been raising public attention. I will show my preference by giving some rational evidence.
It is conspicuous that ready-made routes can increase the performance of kids in studying due to the rational break period, or it can make children avoid being addicted to games or cartoons. Putting aside these benefits, there is a huge drawback to controlling kids too much, and flexibility is one of them. If children always follow a ready-made route, it means they could be at risk of being passive, which could affect the flexibility of their work in the future. What’s more, the compulsory of their parents deters kids from interacting with their friends, shortening their relationships and isolating them from the outside world. A vivid example is that somewhere in Vietnam, due to the credo that adults are always right and the over-control of parents, kids have become autistic.
On the other hand, letting kids to do what they like in leisure time is believed to be rational in some places. Children are very vulnerable, so the way parents teach them affects their characteristics a lot. Freedom can give kids relaxation, and it can also shield them from parents’ tutelage, which limits kids’ creativity. In America, children are free in their leisure time, so they can acquire a wealth of new knowledge, which is very helpful in their career. Although many people lament that their kids can acquire bad things from the internet, this is also a chance for kids to learn. An early-open mind can help children to understand fully the world.
In conclusion, both managing credo have their own benefits, but children should be allowed to follow their interest. Parent should consider to the way they teach their kids to not let to the bad consequence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-12 | muskan shaikh | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | vevinawynn | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Yen Minh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Yen Minh | 73 | view |
- Young people today spend too much money and time following fashion trends clothing tech To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 89
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Sample topic Children who start reading earlier in life perform better later on in their school studies How important are early reading skills in a child s academic performance What other preschool factors influence a child s later academic achievements 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...s in the credo of kids’ management, and the question of whether parents should control the leisure time...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01547987616 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74341141727 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544891640867 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8072827255 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279753833398 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098609156093 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697388984787 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185306048532 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432707998998 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.