Education is one the most important matters that every government must consider. Setting the school's schedule and thinking about subjects and the importance of them is a problem to be argued. It is a debate among people which is whether history is the most important subject in school's curriculum or subjects like Science and technology have more value. This essay will discuss both opinions below.
On the one hand, undoubtfully, all of the students have to know about the history of their nations or other countries. This is important because of several reasons. First of all, having information about what has happened in the past not only can prevent people not to make a mistake twice but also lead them to hold valuable aspects of the culture. Furthermore, juveniles must be familiar with their motherland history and try to know about others in order to communicate with foreigners with different cultures.
On the other hand, Science and Technology are the keys to the future world's door. The development process will be stopped of these fields will be neglected. In addition, kids must get familiar with technologies from low age in order to know how to deal with them in future and what is the appropriate way of using them. Finally, technology can improve children's creativity. For instance, if students learn how to work with different softwares, they may be good developers in future.
To sum up, in my opinion, having more focus on courses which contain science and technology subjects can be more effective, however, the value of knowing about history should not be neglected.
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century. The map below shows the development of the village.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the development of the village. 61
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 75
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 86
- Did bees a type of insect exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests The structures have been found inside 200 million year old fossilized trees in the 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...elow. On the one hand, undoubtfully, all of the students have to know about the history...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...d Technology are the keys to the future worlds door. The development process will be s...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... softwares, they may be good developers in future. To sum up, in my opinion, having mo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for instance, in addition, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04150943396 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68819658031 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562264150943 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1152243763 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4285714286 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254080925384 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938025773682 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087863237173 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170424041712 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133828817955 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.