Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Environmental issues have become more evident within the last couple years. Some people believe that one of the main problems for this is the loss of flora and fauna. Others state that there are bigger problems compared to this loss. Personally, I side with latter view.

On one hand, some people might believe that the extinction of some plants and animals is the main cause of environmental issues nowadays since it is what is mainly shown on television. The loss of any flora or fauna might cause dramatical changes to the ecosystem. For instance, animals that feed on a certain plant that no longer exists might find themselves looking for different source of food which can already be the source for a different animal, leaving it with a shortage of supplies. Not only for that animal but for other types of animals who feed on the same plant as well, which can consequently lead to their extinction.

On the other hand, everyday life shows us there are more important problems than this and that are one of the main causes for those animals and plants to go extinct. For instance, the rhino, which are killed for their horns, has almost become extinct due to the constant hunting that, unfortunately, is still allowed and practised in some countries. Furthermore, agricultural companies have cut down millions of hectares in the Amazon, for example, where thousands of animals and plants species live, just for the sake of expanding their business. They fail to take into account the amount of flora and fauna that is being destroyed by doing so.

To sum up, I think that even though flora and fauna extinction is one of the main environmental concerns nowadays, we need to look at the bigger picture and consider the reasons for them to go extinct in the first place, such as the reduction and exploitation of their natural habitat caused by agricultural industries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, so, still, well, for example, for instance, i think, such as, to sum up, in the first place, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8722741433 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58535072911 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542056074766 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.3317269841 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2307692308 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205674909249 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872252254552 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069527890861 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138847007873 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730995521906 0.056905535591 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.