Nowadays, hand-held phones play essential roles in sharing information and bringing people closer. Nevertheless, some argue that using cell phones should be prohibited in public places such as libraries or public transport. I partly agree with this view.
On the one hand, critics of using high-tech gadgets in public places have their own justifications. First, the library is a silent place in which people can have a high concentration to stay focus on their tasks. For this reason, a disturbance noise such as the sound of chatting apps or the ringtone will interrupt them from their flow of thinking. Moreover, using mobile phones on the roads can lead to car crashes or accidents for both the owners and others. Various studies have shown that this action can reduce the drivers’ visual scanning of the road ahead and make them slower in responding to hazards.
On the other hand, using smartphones may have benefits in some situations. First, students can use this device for searching for information when needed. Furthermore, it plays as a navigation tool. In particular, pedestrians and motor drivers sometimes have difficulty when driving on the complex road system. Consequently, using an online map ensures they arrive at the right place in a short time. Last but not least, in emergency states like being followed or having an accident, victims can easily call the police station or hospital for urgent help.
In conclusion, when considering both positive impacts such as searching for information or calling for urgent help, and negative ones including distracting people and leading to accidents in some circumstances, I believe that high-tech gadgets can be used in public places, but with some restrictions.
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 67
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted to do To what extent do you agree or not 78
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed However some people think that zoos are useful for protecting rare animals Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that the development of technology has made our life more complex and the solution is to live a simpler life without technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, in particular, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21863799283 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82648248261 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609318996416 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2825200387 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218004601853 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745030820347 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113561366243 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167738807131 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127844118449 0.056905535591 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.