There are more advertisements aimed at children. Some people believe that they have negative effects on children and should be banned. Do you agree or disagree?
It is undeniable that a rising number of advertisements target children. While advertisers argue that they just provide information about the products, I agree with the view that advertising induces kids to convince them to buy things that are not necessary.
On the one hand, some advertisers claim that their information is useful. Specifically, by comparing similar products, children can learn the way to become smart consumers. Additionally, advertisements sometimes can provide the young with useful information. Take the advertisement of Lifebuoy as an example. By watching them on TV, kids can learn how to wash their hands properly, which is vitally important, especially in the unprecedented COVID-19.
On the other hand, I concur with the critics of those who consider that parents should wary of the ads to which their children are exposed. First, children under a certain age are not able to realize whether they need the products or not. In other words, they tend to be swayed by the attractive ads and buy unnecessary goods that can be thrown away in the short term. Furthermore, when it comes to food promotion impacts, such as fast food or confectioneries, kids are inclined to be attracted. As a result, they will persuade their parents to pay buy for them. For example, the long-term high intake of sugar or trans-fat contained in these products can be harmful to children, leading to many chronic diseases, such as obesity or diabetes.
In conclusion, while advertisements sometimes provide essential information, they also put pressure on children, which leads to potential problems in the future.
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will use up the world s resources Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed However some people think that zoos are useful for protecting rare animals Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both of 84
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted to do To what extent do you agree or not 78
- When designing a building the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24521072797 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06032668976 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593869731801 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8990526414 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7857142857 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208416570788 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073281268714 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389575288595 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129019750056 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288506619497 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.