Music has been always crucial in human's life and their traditions. It is said by masses that music is a significant style to unite people from the distinctive cast, creed or age group. , However, the content and lyrics sometimes act as a barrier. This essay will highlight that music is certainly advantageous despite few inevitable drawbacks.
To start with, there, are several reasons to support that music is integral in breaking the wall between people. Firstly, music allows folks to groove together, whenever a musical event is held in a concert audience forget everything about the culture, age, colour and so on, that time only one thing runs through their mind that we are here to enjoy and express our feeling for the music. Secondly, nowadays singers and other artists are not limited within their home country, people follow them from every nook and corners. For example, Enrique Iglesias is an eminent Spanish singer, but he is globally popular among the masses for his love songs. Moreover, his Spanish version of the Bailando song is widely listened to by Indian youths, even it is hardly understood still listen with their full spirit.
In contrast, some possible problems can disbalance social harmony if not cared about, several irrelevant contents or lyrics about a particular community can create social anarchy and later that can be an obstacle in bringing people together, for example about a year ago a singer had kept his incorrect view about a particular community and later numerous reactions and encounters came against him for his irresponsible thought. Furthermore, one who listens to classical music may not like different a genre like pop, rock, jazz, or even if somebody tries to compel that person to listen apart from a classical song he might be grumpy.
In conclusion, although it has been proven that music acts as a binding agent for people, and diminishes the gap between cultures and generations, yet sometimes it can create unseen troubles due to improper or irrelevant contents against a specific community. If targeting is avoided then nothing is better than this to unite people from various cultural backgrounds.
- Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families 93
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom 89
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 87
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e distinctive cast, creed or age group. , However, the content and lyrics sometim...
^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... contents against a specific community. If targeting is avoided then nothing is be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1186440678 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59861254238 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632768361582 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.4625200737 49.4020404114 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 139.384615385 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2307692308 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5384615385 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154298276157 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051734427724 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426055736269 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963521845106 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201489583444 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.