Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.
To extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is thought that music can bridge not only cultural gaps but also the differences in age. I strongly believe that it can bring people all over the world together, however it not a good option in terms of generation disparity. This essay will analyse several reasons to explain my idea.
To commence with, an evident explanation why music exacerbates in understanding between two generations is somewhat related to different tastes in music. In other words, almost the elderly are prone to prefer to listen intricate melodies, classical music and so on rather than electronic music or rap and vice versa for youngsters which in turns causes some challenges for them to deeper understanding each other .In fact, this gap can be widen through music due to the different style of modern its and personalities.
Though music does little alleviate generation barriers, it does help cultures relate through the messages of songs. To be more detailed, by enjoying and watching music videos about particular countries, they can broaden their horizons about lifestyles of the local, the beauty of its, etc. A case in point is Hello Vietnam, english song, or Viet Nam oi, vietnamese song, which can help foreigners gain knowledge about a country in Asia with magnificient and poetic views, friendly and generous people and several distinctions which Vietnam just have.
In conclusion, i opine that people can be exposed to another beautiful cultures in different parts of the world, nevertheless the gap between teenagers and elders can not be narrowed through music.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-29 | Hương Giang | 61 | view |
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 63
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking Therefore the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes in some countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 47
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 78
- The development of science and technology benefit our life However scientists cannot find effective solutions for what they created Do you agree or disagree 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... them to deeper understanding each other .In fact, this gap can be widen through m...
^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...hem to deeper understanding each other .In fact, this gap can be widen through mus...
^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ic due to the different style of modern its and personalities. Though music does...
^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ch Vietnam just have. In conclusion, i opine that people can be exposed to ano...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18897637795 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7507826402 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653543307087 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.9032857993 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.444444444 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210120695426 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872975731599 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434764464144 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131394678796 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433599977926 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.