Some people say that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
The best way to promote recycling from homes is one of the main concerns in the modern world. According to some, this is more likely to be achieved with the help of some seminars and education. And there may be some merit in this view. Yet, in what follows it will be argued that the government ought to adopt strict laws for waste recycling, as this will encourage more people to recycle and there will be certain punishments against each violation of these laws.
The authorities should have mandatory recycling laws, since more people will start to follow them. Many studies have shown that laws against resources waste had positive influence on peoples recycling habits. For instance, enforcing a law to have several types of recycling bins enables people to separate the garbage, as some part of this waste can be utilized again, after undergoing some cleaning procedures. Therefore, legislating strong policies can result in increased number of people who will consider recycling more wisely.
Another possible way that enacting laws can motivate people to recycle waste might be done by punishments. it is not hard to note that implementing certain sanctions against breaking certain rules will lead to decline in the number of law violations. Thus, when people realize that they may lose financially if they don’t recycle enough waste from their apartments, they will develop their recycling habits.
In conclusion, it was demonstrated that the government will be able to make people recycle their waste by applying relevant laws, since more and more people will start to recycle from homes, otherwise, they will be aware that they will get punished. Though some believe that legal requirements might not be enough, other options should be considered as well such as education and advertising, still, mandatory recycling laws are the best solution to this issue so far.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- It is a common aspiration among people to run their own business, rather that work for an employer. Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 84
- Some people that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views and giv 73
- Many young children have unsupervised access to the internet and are using the internet to socialise with others.What problems do children face when going online without parental supervision?How can these problems be solved? 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007. 67
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...cle waste might be done by punishments. it is not hard to note that implementing c...
^^
Line 18, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...best solution to this issue so far.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2671009772 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58490759727 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540716612378 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6408575918 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.384615385 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359969541301 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141119354137 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728472943949 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246890110486 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284535879523 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.