Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, there have been discussions about the most enjoyable way of seeing movies. While certain individuals believe that cinema has given them a better platform of enjoying their movies, others claim that seeing films on their phones and computers leave them fully satisfied. In my opinion, I believe going to the cinema is more satisfying.
However, those who support the idea of watching films on mobile phones back up their claim with a number of reasons. Firstly, they believe that a cinema has a big screen and this makes the display to be bold, loud and clear. There are big speakers at every corner of any cinema which projects the voices and sound tracks of the movie being shown in the theatre. For example, I visited the national theatre at orile iganmu to see a recently released movie, in company of my family members, and we all enjoyed ourselves. Secondly, the excitement and cheers that come with watching a play in the midst of a large crowd seems to attract many to the cinema. I remember clearly a movie I watched at amphi theatre during my undergraduate days; it was fun-filled as the crowd that converged that cold night made it memorable. Lastly, it might be cheaper to go to the cinema than wasting money on purchasing internet access data to see movies on laptops. Cinema is volume driven, hence the reduced price of access tickets to viewers.
Nevertheless, the proponents of phone movies point to the fact that they have full control of the time to watch or not to watch films, and this seems to provide some flexibility. They also argue that the risk involved in either driving or transporting themselves to the cinema is enormous. For instance, during last year festive season, over thirty people going to the national theatre were caught up in a fatal road accident. Despite all these claims supporting watching plays in a solitary mode, the benefits enjoyed by those who visit cinemas are overwhelming.
In conclusion, I believe that many people would continue to patronize movie theatres to explore the positives that come with seeing movies on a large screen, relatively cheap ticket and fun filled atmosphere to watching movies in solitude and quite environments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | Mimibae 985 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Extreme sports such as skydiving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Some young people believe it’s best to move out of their hometowns when they become adults, while others wish to live in their hometowns their whole lives.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s tickets to viewers. Nevertheless, the proponents of phone movies point to ...
^^
Line 9, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that the risk involved in either driving or transporting themselves to the cinema...
^^
Line 9, column 481, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a solitary mode" with adverb for "solitary"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... these claims supporting watching plays in a solitary mode, the benefits enjoyed by those who visi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9436997319 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56877036203 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581769436997 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.013129815 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3125 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192597460763 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650944886971 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041005048355 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111081676589 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608888893711 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.