Some people think that the reason for learning a foreign language is to travel to or work in a foreign country. By contrast, others maintain that there are more reasons for them to study a foreign language. This essay analyzes both viewpoints and concludes that the reasons for learning a foreign language should transcend the limits of travel or work.
In terms of people who only consider the value of learning a foreign language as travel or work, it is undeniable that many people learn a new language mainly to get a job. Indeed, recent years have been witnessing a growing tendency of immigration workers from China to Japan, and my best friend is a vivid example. When working abroad, you have to compete with the locals and it is almost impossible to get a job if you don't know any of the local languages. Also, traveling to a country with proficiency of linal languages can largely enable us to get a more realistic picture of the local customs and really enjoy the journey. However, a potential drawback of such a reason is that one may give up learning foreign languages if he has no plans to work or travel abroad. In fact, globalized studies with foreign languages are of great importance throughout everyone’s life.
When comes to people giving more reasons for learning foreign languages, some students have to learn a foreign language in order to be able to study abroad and Some people will learn foreign languages to read original paper to further their research, such as books, journals, etc.. Thiswork is because either overseas schools or paperwork have a context that is inseparable from its language and would lose its core spiri if translated into other languages. Also, it seems too uneconomic to learn a foreign language just for travel or just for a job in a country, since the opportunities are not always available.
Actually, as for studying foreign languages, the reasons for work or traveling abroad and other reasons are not intrinsically paradoxical. it is presumptuous to make any sweeping generalizations. Instead, we should think more critically based on different circumstances. To conclude, there are positive aspects to both the initiatives of work or travel and others like studying abroad. Nevertheless, it is clear that we should transcend the limits of travel or work to better understand the reasons for foreign language studies.
- Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 60
- adopting new stricter regulation for handing and storing coal ash 80
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals 80
- Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s almost impossible to get a job if you dont know any of the local languages. Also, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...r research, such as books, journals, etc.. Thiswork is because either overseas sch...
^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...sons are not intrinsically paradoxical. it is presumptuous to make any sweeping ge...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, as for, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80501504295 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492462311558 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2370874846 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.058823529 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4117647059 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.510971547103 0.244688304435 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185478910415 0.084324248473 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149417903182 0.0667982634062 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.358869251479 0.151304729494 237% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857522546245 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s almost impossible to get a job if you dont know any of the local languages. Also, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...r research, such as books, journals, etc.. Thiswork is because either overseas sch...
^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...sons are not intrinsically paradoxical. it is presumptuous to make any sweeping ge...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, as for, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80501504295 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492462311558 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2370874846 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.058823529 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4117647059 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.510971547103 0.244688304435 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185478910415 0.084324248473 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149417903182 0.0667982634062 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.358869251479 0.151304729494 237% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857522546245 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.