SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT PARENTS SHOULD ENCOURAGE THIER CHILDREN TO TAKE PART IN ORGANISED GROUP ACTIVITIES IN THEIR FREE TIME. OTHERS SAY THAT IT IS IMPORTANT IMPORTANT FOR CHILDREN TO LEARN HOW TO OCCUPY THEMSELVES ON THEIR OWN.
Childhood activities are the fundamental pillars of their personalities as they acquire knowledge and skills. Some parents prefer to inspire their children to involve in many group activities to kill their spare time whereas others believe that it is vital to let them decide how to use their leisure time. This essay will discuss both perspectives and explain how the engagement in the teamwork is an excellent approach compared to other.
Many people consider the best way to use their children’s free time is by contributing in the group play as it enhances their teamwork skills, leadership, and ability to work in the collaboration. Since these skills are the instrinsic requirements of their future professional life, hence by knowing and acquiring them at very early age which would increase their potency. Many workers who never involved in collaborative work during their childhood, had found struggling with their occupational task, due to lack of required skills. If children learn these abilities in the childhood, the future of them become very rewarding.
On the other side, others rely on their children’s decision on how interestingly they occupy themselves in their free time. They have to do critical thinking before they make any plans and majority of time they come up with many creative games, hobies, and play. That is why this view is supported as it boosts the sense of decision making and creation. If the chance is give, many kids have proven themselves by showing extraordinary skills and ideas. Now-a-days many schools are adopting these innovative approach.
Overall, the kids who made their own decision on what to do have benefits to improve their creativity and profound thinking even though they engage in many group activities, which are responsible for many key skills development such as leadershship, teamwork and cooperation. Thus I believe, children ought to take active participation in those games is the radical move for their future.
- The plans below show the public park when it first open in 1920 and the same park today 11
- SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT MUSIC IS A GOOD WAY TO BRING PEOPLE FROM DIFFERENT CULTURES AND AGES TOGETHER.TO WHAT EXTEND DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE GIVE YOUR OPINION 61
- IN SOME AREAS OF THE US, A CURFEW IS IMPOSED, IN WHICH TEENAGERS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BE OUT OF DOORS AFTER A PARTICULAR TIME AT NIGHT UNLESS THEY ARE ACCOMPANIED BY AN ADULT. 78
- Some people believe that it is better to educate girls and boys in separate schools. Others, however, believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools.Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 84
- The pie chart show the investment by the Australian government in energy sectors and the generation of energy from those sources in 2010 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lent approach compared to other. Many people consider the best way to use thei...
^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...ies, which are responsible for many key skills development such as leadershship, teamw...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...leadershship, teamwork and cooperation. Thus I believe, children ought to take activ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, thus, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28301886792 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90728670215 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578616352201 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2351738416 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31314814717 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111551575809 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105071631312 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200064148703 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445920969568 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.