In recent years, there has been considerable discussion about the negative impacts of computer games on children. This has led to a suggestion that children should be prohibited from indulging in this Internet-based entertainment. Personally speaking, I would disagree with this statement to a large extent for the following two reasons.
To begin with, playing computer games helps reduce children’s stress. For example, students in China are always deprived of their leisure time and childhood. Not only do they spend approximately more than 9 hours per day at school but they also need to grapple with various kinds of assignments and test papers. Moreover, they are forced to take after-school classes at cram schools or language institutes in the hope of improving their academic performances and getting an offer from one of the most prestigious high schools or universities in China. Due to this enormous pressure of schoolwork, children need some relaxation, and computer games offer them an easy way to relieve their stress.
In addition, computer games can cultivate some good qualities in children such as teamwork and communicative skills. For instance, computer games require the collaboration of two or more people to complete a game. Take the tank game as an example. Tanks are usually divided into four positions: a commander, driver, gunner, and loader. In order to get the ultimate victory in the competitive game, all of these four people need excellent cooperation and communicative skills to drive the tank to the final destination without being attacked by their rivals. If they could apply these spirits to their real life, they might be very likely to be successful in their schoolwork and future careers.
In conclusion, it seems that computer games are not completely harmful in every aspect and that it should be treated rationally. Despite the negative impacts of this innovative entertainment, computer games could help children relax and foster some important skills crucial to their life and future. Therefore, we should endeavor to reduce the negative impacts of computer games and maximize their positive influences.
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every way Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop 95
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- now a days more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face it is a positive or a negative development 95
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 73
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33823529412 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92054380631 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.266452998 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.764705882 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297627821867 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108073978077 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960234608349 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178220038129 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331845140621 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.