Some people say that products should be designed to last as long as possible.Others say that it is more important for
to be as cheap as possible .
A lot of people say that products ought to be designed to last as long as probably. Other people say that it is most significant for to be as cheap as probably.
In the social point of view, products must be designed to use longer time why people want to use more time this production. On the other hand, others believe that it is more impact for to be cheap everywhere.
Actually, we can see that plenty of production is gradually expensive however its structure and quality probably well. In additional, some ones is drammatically sold more expensive but it is not high quality.
In the world of marketing, proffesions consider that products should be cheap on avarege especially it must consists of with answering all demand. Therefore factory might achieve to sell all of products. Even though some ones are gradually expensive, it is poor-quality and people do not use long time it.
In the economic point of view, now, different factories is manufactured various products. Interestingly, their goal is sold so much their ones and they use several types of advertisement. In additional, we can see them on television, radio, mobile phones and other electronic devices. In my view, for example, phone factory has the best products and there are a lot of mobile phones and it called Samsung. For plenty of years, million of peopleare bought phones there and too me. Then i have used it for three years however it has no old yet. My phone's price was two million of sum.
To sum up, some people say that products should be organized to last as long as possible. Many people rely on this point which it is the best important this ones must be cheap. I totally agree this point.
- The chart below shows the changes that take place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre in 2003 and 2012
- The chart below shows the changes that take place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre in 2003 and 2012
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people 56
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s most significant for to be as cheap as probably. In the social point of view, ...
^^
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... consists of with answering all demand. Therefore factory might achieve to sell all of pr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...it called Samsung. For plenty of years, million of peopleare bought phones there and to...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 152, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...is point which it is the best important this ones must be cheap. I totally agree thi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70508474576 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67639086904 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515254237288 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1235895307 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.0526315789 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5263157895 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403381995457 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122666747821 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145061711451 0.0667982634062 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232272455296 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161041152907 0.056905535591 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.0946893788 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.