Product value has been a matter of contention. There have appeared endless conflicting attitudes towards this: Some people hold firm to the belief that durability should be the main priority, whereas others are of the opinion that affordable price is paramount. From my perspective, such notions require further deliberation.
On the one hand, environmental protection is worth contemplating. It is widely acknowledged that the longer products last, the more waste and emissions are reduced. In other words, this means declining the amount of redundant outcomes is a green movement that alleviates environmental issues.
On the other hand, trend catching is of paramount importance. It cannot be denied that in today’s competitive world, people have a tendency to compare themselves with others' material conditions, but not everyone can purchase famous brands. As a result, people seek cheaper products that have the same designs with high-end labels such as Louis Vuitton, Chanel or Gucci to flex themselves.
However, an alternative solution to product value would be to strike a balance between using longevity products or buying affordable ones: Factories ought to find both quality and affordable materials for manufacturing, and consumers should think carefully before making decisions. Such matters not only profit the customers but also enhance the business's reputation and fame, and waste is also declined. For instance, in the cosmetic industry, businesses can use natural substances instead of chemical resources for products such as organic masks, body scrubs or green tea face cream.
All in all, while each side has its own advantage, I favor the fact that produce factories should cut down the range of poor outcomes and replace them with good quality products. Businesses and consumers ought to consider the aforementioned notion to make the right decision.
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea and make comparisons where appropriate 73
- The flow charts shows the production of cement and concrete 89
- Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 95
- Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 84
- Some people believe that hosting international sports events is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both these views and state your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, whereas, while, for instance, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51211072664 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88541482402 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664359861592 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5018304776 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.785714286 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200956172156 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551268981521 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488422870041 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965687628623 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441282262598 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.