Some people say that rich countries should help poor countries with trade, health and education. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience.
Opinions vary on whether it is essential or not that wealthy countries take the responsibility for assistance towards poor developing nations in commerce, education and health fields in particular. Observing all advantages and disadvantages, I strongly believe that international aid from industrial countries is rather imperative and it would be obviously more beneficial than negatively influential for the population overall.
First and foremost, developing countries are plagued by the overwhelming number of issues that they are unable to tack with independently due to the lack of financial resources. Even when they are striving to address some problems and remedy the situation by external financial sources such as World Bank, it frequently leads to the total disappearance of money and no changes in the weak life conditions. Whereas wealthy governments have enough accumulations, proficiency and experience to share their valuable knowledge with poor states and deteriorate the severe degree of poverty and unemployment rates of particular countries, combat with the lack of education and address the weak international trade. Just to exemplify, recently the G8 assembly has forgiven tremendous part of developing countries’ debts and introduce new system of loans with less-percentage interest rate, what enhanced significantly the ability of poor countries for further evolvement.
Furthermore, the majority of African countries are under sub-human conditions for existence and they lack any financial resources to make any changes. Also, the fast-paced spread of hazardous diseases results in even more detrimental effects that they unable to tackle with. The advent of technology in industrial countries ensures them with high quality equipment and talented specialists to cope with majority of health disorders, hence it is obviously necessary to relocate some educated personal for remedy the demanding population from time to time. Last but not the least, it is of note that developing countries tend to export mostly agricultural products and raw materials whereas import industrial products and processed items what inevitably leads to deficit in economy. At the same time, developed nations could direct poor countries in creation new sources of income such as erection fabrics and proper utilization of their own lands and natural resources what will hardly increase their national incomes.
To conclude, I firmly believe, that aid from wealthy governments to poor states and countries could be much more beneficial than it is expected: it would reinforce international relationships dramatically, hardly reduce the gap between rich and developing countries and promote to significant part and parcel of population decent living conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-04 | Chinkiarora | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-03 | kimtaeyeons | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | Anastasia0511 | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | Anastasia0511 | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | Anastasia0511 | 78 | view |
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers They are used in businesses hospitals crime detection and even to fly planes What things will they be used for in future Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of th 89
- Some people think that when recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently when others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in team and follow instructions Discuss both views and giv
- The diagram below shows an automatic photo booth Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, whereas, as for, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2358.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7512195122 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12720213902 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570731707317 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4866835666 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 196.5 106.682146367 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.1666666667 20.7667163134 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228699463095 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833929857184 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045455022625 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142863441921 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172670836008 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.7 13.0946893788 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.05 50.2224549098 40% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.