Some people support the idea of imposing taxes on fossil fuels ( oil, coal, and gas) in order to reduce energy consumption. Others disagree with this approach.
Consider the debate and its arguments, and come to your own conclusion.
In the new millennium and as a result of industrialization the usage of various types of fossil fuels increased consistently. In such a context, some people, unlike many others, aver that the city-planners should impose higher taxes on these fuels to deter the general public from using oil, coal, and gas. Others, however, disagree entirely mentioning cogent arguments regarding their claim. Nevertheless, there are strong feelings on both sides of the argument which should be considered.
On the one hand, the advocate of enacting higher taxes assert that increasing the cost of fossil fuel could contribute to lower consumption, which considered beneficial for the community. The main reason supporting their claim is the fact that when prices climbing up, the general public has to allocate more fund for fulfilling their needs and consequently it forces them to use less and as far as their financial condition permit.
On the other hand, the opponents of this idea have a multitude of sagacious reasons ranging from social to economical. First and foremost claim appears to be the fact that by increasing the fuels price irrespective of their type the destitute members of society will encounter higher pressure in terms of meeting their energy needs. This can contribute to devastating effects not only for the vulnerable people but also for the well-income citizens. As a case in point, impoverished city-dwellers have to find other alternative methods to pay the expense of their energy usage and this may lead to committing petty crimes. In addition to this, imposing higher taxes on fuels to eliminate their consumption is considered to childish approach. If the citizens do not have any other source of energy involving environmental-friendly energies to select from they inevitably suffer from this unwise law. Besides, some alternative and more effective methods are available to shrink the energy consumption such as raising the awareness of the general public through social media and special campaigns in this regard.
To sum up, according to the aforementioned remarks it is crystal clear that maybe it would be the easiest tactic to increase fossil fuels for reducing their consumption, but it appears that this method could cause unfavorable consequence and could be rejected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-21 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 78 | view |
- It is true to say that in the new millennium people pay too much attention to monetary things 89
- In the new millennium by the advent of smartphone almost every sphere of human lives have been affected in some ways 78
- Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. How far do you share this viewpoint? 78
- Due to the fact that in order to produce in order to produce meat normally more area will be needed in comparison with a crop, some people aver that meat usage should be diminished in all corner of the world. 73
- The maps demonstrate various changes having happened in the village of Stokeford by 2010. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...igher taxes on these fuels to deter the general public from using oil, coal, and gas. Others, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... fact that when prices climbing up, the general public has to allocate more fund for fulfillin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 742, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ion is considered to childish approach. If the citizens do not have any other sour...
^^
Line 3, column 1036, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...on such as raising the awareness of the general public through social media and special campai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, as to, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3095890411 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99259108903 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564383561644 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3297883601 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.428571429 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0714285714 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22659489202 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766479511549 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525403435565 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123244773745 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398402769214 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.