Some people sya that the government should stop TV and newspapers from showing crimes because media coverage of violent crime is frightening people and encouraging criminals. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Nowadays crimes are increasing rapidly. Some people believe that violence begets violence. There is no doubt, sensational news coverage of violence is providing a free media platforms to criminals. It also terrifies citizens, and encourage the criminals for new ways of violence. However, I do believe stopping or censoring tha print or digital media from reporting such incidents for variety of reasons, described as below
The evidence does suggest that the reporting of violence can trigger further crime. On account of this, two pattern emerge in society. Firstly, it encourages the criminals to copy the modus operandi for their cause. Some criminals glorify act of wrongdoing and felony. Secondly, some hard-core criminals need media attention to spread their message, create fear and recruit followers. Apparently, the criminal psychology stemming from these pattern is disturbing, and could endanger citizens life and peace. Considering this fact, the first human reaction comes is to stop reporting such incidents.
In contrast, some people believe that shying away from the reality never serves the purpose. They assert that such reporting helps citizens to be aware of crime happening near them. They get perceived warning for their safety by watching or reading such crime reports. For example, the popular TV show, 'crime petrol' analyses the behaviour of criminals. The informed and sagacious citizens learn the positive of this crime show to protect themselves from falling into any trap.
In conclusion, this ethical dilemma reminds us of a great expression-"Is this glass half-full or half-empty?" I acknowledge the fact, media coverage of violence leads to further violence, and frightens people. At the same time, prohibition of reporting violence does not serve the purpose in the democratic setting
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-27 | jaynil pandya | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-27 | nidhimehta | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-27 | jaynil pandya | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-27 | jaynil pandya | 67 | view |
- Some people sya that the government should stop TV and newspapers from showing crimes because media coverage of violent crime is frightening people and encouraging criminals Do you agree or disagree with the statement 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and academic world Other believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely 67
- Some people sya that the government should stop TV and newspapers from showing crimes because media coverage of violent crime is frightening people and encouraging criminals Do you agree or disagree with the statement 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and academic world Other believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely 67
- Some people sya that the government should stop TV and newspapers from showing crimes because media coverage of violent crime is frightening people and encouraging criminals Do you agree or disagree with the statement 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'platform'?
Suggestion: platform
...e of violence is providing a free media platforms to criminals. It also terrifies citizen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pattern' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'patterns'.
Suggestion: patterns
... further crime. On account of this, two pattern emerge in society. Firstly, it encourag...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53928571429 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85476463521 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635714285714 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6713892858 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1666666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5555555556 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.9879759519 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252036662643 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729608366156 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392914528094 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142807765681 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062371397192 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.