Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Some people argue that universities should allow students to study subjects of their interests whilst others contend that only those proving beneficial to their future career should be adopted in the academic curriculum. Although each method has its own advantages, which will further be elucidated in this essay, I personally concur with the former viewpont.
On the one hand, there are reasons for people to hold a belief that students should study their favourite subjects. Firstly, students would have greater source of inspiration and motivation if they are allowed to study what they are enthusiastic about. They would learn more actively, preparing new lessons and doing their homework without being reminded. Also, they will feel more comfortable and be likely to focus all their efforts on studying, which means higher academic performance will ensue. (They will feel more comfortable in the classroom and will consequently push themselves to work hard and give the best academic performance possible.) Secondly, that students are able to determine on the subjects they are going to study will make it easier for them to define their strengths, optimise their potentials and subsequently achieve success in their professional life.
On the other hand, studying subjects that are likely to be favourable in the near future could be of great benefits to students. There is no desputing that such subjects as those related to science and technology is the backbone of the process of industrialisation and modernisation. Therefore, promoting such majors would strengthen and foster these processes, making the world moderner and more civillised. Another point worth mentioning is that since these subjects are supposed to be in demand in the years to come, many students’ career prospects would be greatly enhanced should they be able to equip themselves with necessary relevant knowledge. Accordingly, the quality of life and the general well-being of many students and their families could be tremendously advanced.
By way of conclusion, although studying useful subjects such as science and technology would benefit them in various ways, I believe that students should be given the right to choose and study their favourite subjects at tertiary education level.
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films.Why could this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 89
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films.Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 95
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 73
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films.Why could this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese processes, making the world moderner and more civillised. Another point worth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45480225989 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83538856688 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550847457627 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.9875036127 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.928571429 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478678440758 0.244688304435 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159710878782 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852545959749 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295795233462 0.151304729494 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133100300813 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.