Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should be only allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should be only allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
The viewpoint that university students should be allowed to study a subject of their choosing is something that I agree with. The freedom to choose and study from a vast variety of options encourages pupils to attend university and enhance learning in their field of interest. This opportunity is going to create highly educated professionals in different fields and provide them with a pathway to pursue their career in the major of their choosing.
The idea that students should only be allowed to study subjects that are beneficial for the future leads to the possibility that a large number of students who do not take interest in the given options may never pursue a degree at the university or may dropout during their course due to failures. Forcing students to stick to certain choices during university years creates pupils that no longer study out of interest and are just continuing education to keep up with the rest of their peers. This also disheartens them and leads them to lose self-confidence as they tend to face comparatively more failures than their classmates. Whereas they would have thrived if they were given the opportunity to choose from the subjects of their interest.
For instance, if a student who is naturally more skilled at arts is coerced into choosing medicine, the outcome would be an average skilled doctor that too, if that student manages to complete his degree. On the contrary, if the student was allowed to pursue with their passion in Arts and Designing it would have produced a naturally skilled individual who could contribute with their talent to the fashion industry and enhance this industry for the future.
The current trend of the world requires skilled professionals in almost all fields of work and hence specifying as to what subjects are useful for the future is an outdated idea. Providing students with the opportunity to pursue higher education in whatever they choose is going to result in highly trained professionals across all fields, thus upgrading the workforce throughout all the industries. This will also create higher job opportunities for students in a variety of areas instead of all the graduates competing for the limited opportunities in similar work fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-09 | joenen | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | linhchi1409 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | keval_1020 | 65 | view |
| 2021-08-03 | Nellyneedtolearnmore | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-24 | mitss99 | 73 | view |
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom Discuss both opinions and give your opinion 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don t need and can t afford What are the reasons for this behavior What actions can be taken to prevent people from having this problem 73
- Write about the following topic There is a lot of pressure on young people today to succeed academically As a result some people believe that non academic subjects such as physical education and cookery should be removed from the school syllabus so that c 67
- In many countries laws are passed by politicians and elected officials Individual citizens elect their leaders but they do not vote on laws directly Law making would be improved if more decisions were made by referendum In other words important decisions 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...he future leads to the possibility that a large number of students who do not take interest in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, whereas, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98916967509 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65244462182 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523465703971 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8031995355 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.555555556 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7777777778 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18962771456 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951417579378 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865827262229 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133883513954 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601309612418 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.