Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is common thought that students should only study subjects that they are interested in. On the other hand, other opinion is that higher education should focus on things like science and technology which give students advantages afterwards. I totally agree with the latter viewpoint.
On the one hand, it is certainly true that studying whatever you like does wonder for several cases, especially if the student is the experienced person. That is because when students have a great knowledge about their careers, they will know what is the best for their future so they can choose subjects which are good for their career path. That’s why an increasing number of on-demand training centers are established worldwide.
On the other hand, I believe students should be taught in a logical program including knowledge and skills are valuable for their pursuit of achievement in the future. Most students especially freshmen is… about who they will become because they have little exposure to their future job environment. So it is crucial to give an orientation including which knowledge they have to gain and how important it is. In addition, this kind of education system could contribute to saving time experiencing various subjects to work out what is good and worth studying which happens when students study what they are keen on from the beginning of their college days.
To conclude, it can not be denied that study as a hobby is good for some cases but I completely argued that students should be taught in a strictly designed education scheme.
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both views and give 61
- The bar chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, in addition, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06589147287 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5856664389 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4208304313 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.818181818 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340555906466 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12765493655 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839215851368 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221984441337 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597294883527 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.