Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In today’s society, people hold various views as to whether university students should only study subjects critical for the future or they should be given the freedom to have their own choice. Whereas there are some persuasive arguments to the contrary, it is my personal belief that everyone can study their preferred areas.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why subjects related to science or technology are considered useful in the future. Firstly, breakthroughs seen in fields such as medicine, education, entertainment are all due to scientific researches as well as technological advancements, which means that they have a crucial role to play in this current world. Accordingly, a focus on science and technology in higher education would lead to new inventions for the country, resulting in greater national prosperity. Secondly, by forcing students to learn certain subject areas, the government is able to fill gaps in the education system so that many professional citizens would be trained and thus contribute to sustainable development of the nation.
On the other hand, I agree with those who believe that students have the opportunity to study whatever they like. To embark on, they will benefit more if they are allowed to focus their time and energy on areas they have passion for instead of being forced to learn a bunch of subjects that they have no interest in. For instance, if some students are tempted to language-related subjects rather than number-related ones, they should have the freedom to develop themselves to their full potential. Furthermore, we are all unable to accurately predict which fields will be essential in the future. For example, there may be a considerably increasing demand for creative or literary skills in the next few decades, leaving those who specialize in science or technology incapable of adapting to that development, which results in a decreased quality of life in some parts of society.
By way of conclusion, although there are some sensible reasons for universities to focus only on important subjects, I reaffirm my position that everybody should have the right to study whatever they love.
- The diagram below shows the development of Assford between 1965 and the present day 56
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 84
- The tables below show people s reasons for giving up smoking and when they intend to give up Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ay’s society, people hold various views as to whether university students should only study s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21203438395 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92932545329 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567335243553 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6576079311 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.583333333 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0833333333 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.25 7.06120827912 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438711773622 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148371328772 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898910261674 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252577549731 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777753918333 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.