The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001.
The provided chart compares an unidentified family in Australia in terms of its average spending on a monthly basis in two separate years, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, it is evident that the Australian family had a higher monthly average expenditure in 2001 than that of 1991. Also, whereas spending on food, electricity and water, housing, non-essential things experienced an increase, the opposite was true for the figures for clothing and transport.
Looking at the information in more detail, in 1991, about 250 AUD per month was spent on non-essential goods and services, ranking first among all other classifications. This was followed by food (155 AUD), housing (95 AUD), electricity and water (75 AUD), transport (70 AUD), and clothing (30 AUD).
By the year 2001, there was a significant rise of 20 AUD to 270 AUD in the expenses of other goods and services, which accounts for more than a third of the total spending. A similar pattern was noticeable in the expenditure on electricity and water, with the figures standing at 120 AUD after a decade. By contrast, the two only categories to witness a drop were clothing and transport, with the spending falling to 20 AUD and 45 AUD per month respectively. Finally, no remarkable changes were seen in the expenses of food and housing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-07 | shailipatel | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | Drake004 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | Mphthao | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | Mphthao | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Phuong Khanh | 73 | view |
- The tables below show people s reasons for giving up smoking and when they intend to give up Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- Some believe technology has made our lives too complex and the solution is to lead a simpler life without technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 70
- The table shows the proportion of women in the labor force and women in management in five countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, look, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93055555556 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92257998444 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578703703704 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7137319994 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188887683759 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103026706508 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143503118934 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159661605605 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115454988607 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.